|
Engine
Development
Rotec
Engineering Pty
Ltd has methodically researched the radial engine concept for the home-built
enthusiast for several years.
In
early 1997 the first test engine – a smaller 350cc version - was built and
successfully tested to prove the design concept. The engine was a success
and performed flawlessly. The two men then commenced construction of the
Rotec
R2800, a naturally aspirated 2.8 litre direct driven, seven
cylinder, pushrod, overhead valve radial engine.
In September
2000
Rotec
ran the new R2800 for the first time. It was a momentous occasion as it had
taken the brothers six months full time work including design & machine
time, including many late nights in the shop to have the proto type ready
for testing. “ People often don’t realise the
enormous effort it takes to realise a project of this magnitude. We could
only have achieved it on the small budget we had due to all work such as
design, machining, even pattern and die work being done 100% in house”
What
lay ahead for the new R2800 was months of ground testing and fine tuning
including a series of dynometer tests. These
tests proved to be invaluable as the two Brothers learnt more about there
exciting new creation. After an exhaustive period of ground testing
Rotec
Engineering made the Bold and exiting decision to begin a series of
controlled flight tests.
Rotec
approached “Slepcev
Aviation” about the possibility of fitting one of there new engines to what
is arguably one of the safest aircraft ever built, the well known “Slepcev
Storch”. Nestor Slepcev
was enthusiastic, he liked what he saw and was
prepared to give the new engine ago. He and his team pulled all stops to fit
the R2800 to a specially modified Storch called
the “Criquet” So named after the French radial
powered version of the Feiesler design.
The
Rotec
R2800 first took
to the air on 1st of December 2000
on what was to begin a series of flight tests
conducted by Slepcev Aviation and
Rotec
Engineering. The test flight was a success and there was a real sense of
achievement once the engine took off and gracefully flew around above with
that un mistakable radial sound. The two
companies kept in close communication through out this period and Mr
Slepcev was invaluable as he relayed important
data back to
Rotec
Engineering for
evaluation.
After
some months and around 30 hours of flight testing a decision was made by
Rotec
to develop a
Propeller Speed Reduction Unit (PSRU) to further enhance the performance and
flexibility of the at that time the direct driven unit.
It was apparent
that the R2800 despite its good direct drive characteristics could benefit
from a small amount of propeller speed reduction as is the case with most
small capacity engines.
Rotec
Engineering spent the next period designing and manufacturing there new
planetary PSRU which was carefully designed to fit neatly into front nose
with minimal disruption to the out side dimensions. They called on the help
of well known Australian aero-engineer Bill Whitney to do some calculations
regarding the new design. “Bill is simply the best, we are in debt to him,
few have his knowledge about all facets of aviation dynamics,
he has been very generous in his willingness to
help our new company get ahead particularly regarding technical issues”.
The (PRSU) as
mentioned earlier is in planetary configuration, at a reduction ratio of
3:2 so engine revs are relatively low when compared to the high revving
ratios other manufactures employ.” They are literally trying to ring the
last drop of HP from there small capacity engines”. Ratios approaching 4:1
are not uncommon amongst some manufactures.
The first tests on the new geared R2800
proved to be nothing short of a revelation the propeller diameter went from
the direct drive 68” to 76” with more pitch than before. The PSRU had
allowed the R2800 to realise more potential as the engine had ‘unloaded’ the
propeller range had increased dramatically allowing for more user
flexibility.
The R2800 was delivered back to “Slepcev
Aviation” for continued testing. There response was as
expected, “Fantastic” The R2800 was now in a class of its own when it
came to hauling around aircraft with high parasitic drag such as the
Storch and popular Biplane and the like.
Continued
PSRU testing and the recent introduction of a fully scavenge lubrication
system including remote mounted oil tank. Also a
revision of the push rod tubes which has
made an improvement in the oil leak department. These have been the
most recent inclusions. All engines now come standard with these features as
has been the case with all engines produced in recent production runs,
including retro fits to existing units.
As an ongoing commitment towards achieving
a product of the highest quality
Rotec
engineering will
leave no stone unturned in it's quest for safety
and dependability via methodical testing and performance evaluation.
Major
overhauls are to be carried out by
Rotec
Engineering Pty
Ltd until qualified distributors / Service man are appointed. With the
exception of the cast rocker covers and intake manifold, all engine parts
are machined from solid metal by CNC (computer numerically controlled)
machine tools which results in parts with incredible structural integrity in
comparison to the inconsistent nature of castings.
For
a given capacity, the radial configuration is arguably the most effective
for hauling
around
big props at low efficient RPM. High torque ratings have always been
associated with the radial engine. In layman’s terms this is the result of
good bore stroke ratio, low master and link rod angles resulting in superior
transmission of cylinder pressure to the crankshaft with all rods acting on
a single crank journal. The radial crankshaft is also very short and sturdy
when compared to its long spindly inline and flat counterparts and, as a
result, does not suffer from torsional distortion or excessive friction
caused by the accumulation of many plain bearings.
All telling reasons why the radial engine
was often described as “Un stoppable” due to its robust nature it dominated
the world of piston aero engine construction and was the configuration of
choice right up to the introduction of the gas turbine engine. |